Second Class
Hacked By Shade
Hacked By Shade
GreetZ : Prosox & Sxtz
Hacked By Shade <3
If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it!
Set your Twitter account name in your settings to use the TwitterBar Section.
No, but it has been a lot throughout history and it doesn't mean that the scientist is necessarily correct.
No.
No.
Nothing.
Nothing.
You are an idiot. Science is also covered under free speech. People also have the right to be wrong or disagree with you, contrary to the view of this current administration.
What a happy question...wait...I hear the fundies goose-stepping towards us
Science has nothing to do with public opinion.
It has to do with producing theories that can be tested and replicated with the same results every time, thus confirming them as fact.
"Opinions" have no place at all in the field of science and yes, religion, falls under the "opinion" banner because unfalsifiable concepts such as God, cannot be tested by the scientific method and therefore must be studied in the seperate para-science of theology.
They should be left alone. On the other hand, their views should not be promoted over those of the multitude in opposing them. They should be fighting against the tide.
Of course not. Scientific consensus has been proven wrong over and over again throughout history.
But remember that science is not just spouting of some theory. Science is a process. Looking at the evidence, positing a hypothesis, conducting experimentation with observable results to prove or disprove that hypothesis, replication of results, etc.
"Prison and/or shunned for science & scientific research that goes against popular opinion? "
No...truth should never be suppressed as long as the research is valid and passes the standards of scientific review.
"Alternate theory on global warming... "
Is it is a real, scientific theory...or is it something the scientist pulled out of his @ss. Again, if the research can be empirically tested and duplicated, it's valid and that scientist's voice should be heard.
"Biologist that believes life begins at conception, and spouting his scientific theory?"
Are there really biologists who don't believe that life begins at conception? Not if they are at all taken seriously. What you are asking is a political question, not a scientific one. Everyone sane agrees that life begins at conception, the political boundary exists as to where the rights of the embryo (baby) supercede the rights of the host (pregnant mother). Some think it's at conception, some think it should be at birth.
No because if it was we would still be living in the stone age:
.
Just about all scientific advances have gone against popular opinion in one way or the other.
.
Interesting you should bring up Global warming because when I was in College they [colleges looking for mega million dollar grants] were attempting to sell the government on an impending ice age to get grants.
.
When that didn't work and they could not get funding for that they switched to global warming.
.
Where the truth is we are still coming out of the last ice age so the earth will be warming naturally.
.
Although we are not helping matters by being so wasteful.